xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS ACL implementation.

To: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS ACL implementation.
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:30:31 +1100
Cc: "Quang Nguyen (Ngo)" <quang.nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1007583963.3687.4.camel@UberGeek>; from austin@coremetrics.com on Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 02:26:03PM -0600
References: <ACD4093EB009D411BC8A009027D7699660A15D@mail.tapeware.com> <1007583963.3687.4.camel@UberGeek>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
hi,

On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 02:26:03PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> I have a question on the ACL implementation in XFS, is it possible to

[ie. you have a question on POSIX ACLs]

> have "roles" setup so certain people can access certain filesystems,
> etc, regardless of the higher group perms? 

If I understand what you're asking, then I think so, yes.
There's an example ACL usage scenario which I think maps
to what you mean by "roles" over here:
        http://acl.bestbits.at/example.html

Hope this helps.  The people on the acl-devel list will
likely be able to give you better insight into applying
ACLs in everyday use.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>