xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!

Subject: Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!
From: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 16:12:17 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0112051408030.8130-100000@anime.net>
Reply-to: stimits@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dan Hollis wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Xianglong Yuan wrote:
> > I just cross-by an excellent article on various journaling
> > techniques used in ext3.
> > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-fs8.html
> 
> It looks like tux2 is taking a different approach, and one of the goals is
> total data integrity -- not just metadata. They are using phase trees.
> It's been described as "failsafe" whereas XFS and most other journaling fs
> are just "crash resistant".
> 
> http://people.nl.linux.org/~phillips/tux2/phase.tree.tutorial.html
> 
> -Dan
> --
> [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

I'm curious what kind of journaling is used with NTFS, if anyone knows?
I assume it is probably meta.

D. Stimits, stimits@xxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>