On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 at 11:41am, Eric Sandeen wrote
> We do have a 2.5 tree internally, and we're working on it. It will be
> exported via CVS sometime soon.
>
Now that 2.5 has opened, and assuming that you have CVS trees based on
both 2.4.x and 2.5.x, what will be the "purpose" of the trees? Will the
2.4.x tree still be the "main" tree, where bugfixes and feature
enhancements go, to then be ported the the 2.5.x tree? Given that, the
main purpose of the 2.5.x tree would be to keep up with the changes of
2.5? Or will most work be done on the 2.5.x tree, with bug fixes and
enhancements back ported to 2.4.x?
Just curious, really... Thanks!
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
|