| To: | Peter Hiltz <philtz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fatal filesystem bug? |
| From: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Nov 2001 02:20:43 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <3C003B14.9020404@xxxxxxxxxx> <200111250117.fAP1HNE08219@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 |
Hi Peter. Please re-read what I wrote. I might have triggered a bug, but I haven't looked into where it's at. If it's the filesystem or the kernel. I downloaded the 2.4.15-pre7 kernel from cvs and I ran it for 24 hours
^^^^^^^^^^^
about. Today I went into a directory to run a program and the binary was .. broken. Couldn't load. Tried recompiling from source and that failed too, so I looked at the source file and it was missing the end of the file. It was my source so I gather it was the last bytes that were missing.Stefan,If you were running 2.4.15-pre9, I'd say it was the new major oops in the kernel. Fixed in 2.4.16pre1. In case you somehow got caught, here are Al Viro's suggestions on fixing it. <snip> // Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fatal filesystem bug?, Peter Hiltz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Problems with lvm with SGI-XFS release 1.0.2, Alf Wachsmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fatal filesystem bug?, Peter Hiltz |
| Next by Thread: | Best Logfile size for XFS, Roger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |