| To: | Matteo Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Upgrading RH7.1 XFS 1.0.1 to XFS 1.0.2 |
| From: | Harri Haataja <harri.haataja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:28:18 +0200 |
| Cc: | werner maes <werner.maes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111191614001.4591-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from matteo@xxxxxx on Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:17:10PM +0100 |
| Mail-followup-to: | Matteo Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx>, werner maes <werner.maes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <5.1.0.14.2.20011119153233.00a69de0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111191614001.4591-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:17:10PM +0100, Matteo Centonza wrote: > > So do I need to recompile the RH 7.2 package on RH 7.1? > > No, there's a suitable filesystem-2.1.6-2 rpm in RH rawhide: > > http://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=filesystem ISTR there being at least one version (which I've used) that depends on a newer setup package which has some different users and groups. They did some improvements to the default reserved uids in 7.2, I think. I suppose the upgrade version doesn't have such a dependency and I doubt they would have made drastic changes to the basic filesystem. rpm -qlv would tell what the new one contains if you want to be sure. -- The Informix beast isn't a small, cute St Bernard like SMTP. It's a monster of a black dragon, breathing smoke and ESQL C at anyone who dares to approach it. -- Tales from the TCP towers
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Upgrading RH7.1 XFS 1.0.1 to XFS 1.0.2, werner maes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: logfile size, thomas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Upgrading RH7.1 XFS 1.0.1 to XFS 1.0.2, Matteo Centonza |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Upgrading RH7.1 XFS 1.0.1 to XFS 1.0.2, Simon Matter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |