xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: performance degraded 2.4.8 -> 2.4.9?

To: Dan Yocum <yocum@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: performance degraded 2.4.8 -> 2.4.9?
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 14 Nov 2001 09:37:12 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3BF27ACB.B744479A@xxxxxxxx>
References: <3BF1A6F2.273B49C4@xxxxxxxx> <1005696924.21227.4.camel@UberGeek> <3BF27ACB.B744479A@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 08:08, Dan Yocum wrote:
> Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > 
> > I don't know if you can, but I'd suggest using either 2.4.14 or 2.4.15
> > when it's ready since the loopback bug will be fixed in that version.
> 
> 
> Hm?  I guess I missed that one - got a link to a message on l-k that
> 'splains it - I don't see anything in the XFS mailing list archives.
> 
> I should note, I don't think the problem is with XFS since I see the same
> performance degradation using 'dd' to the raw device, too.  But, I know you
> guys touch the kernel code all over the place so maybe something...
> somewhere else?
> 

Its a myth! We do not have changes all over the kernel, and we 
definitely do not have any changes in the block layer. The last
change we had was a different lvm version from Linus, and even
that is gone now.

Having said that I do not know what the cause of the performance 
drop is.

Steve


-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>