| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: dd and xfs |
| From: | Yannick Ribau <yannick.ribau@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:59:02 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3BF145FE.2050003@xxxxxxx> <1005669205.19062.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011011 |
So it might work if I boot from a rescue CD with a kernel supporting
xfs, then do the dd command without mounting the partitions (using
/dev/hda...) ?
Yannick. Steve Lord wrote: On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 10:10, Yannick Ribau wrote:hi all,is it possible to make a "dd conv=noerror /dev/hda2 /dev/hda3" to have a complete backup of my root filesystem, then do a "dd conv=noerror /dev/hda3 /dev/hda2" to restore it, in case of a soft filesystem problem ?(both partitions have the exact same size)On a live filesystem this is not too smart an idea, the block cache and the live filesystem are not totally coherent - in fact depending on the kernel version they can be totally incoherent (changes to one are invisible in the other). You at least need to do a remount readonly to make the disk image stable - and this will fail if a file is open for writing SteveYannick. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: dd and xfs, D. Stimits |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?, Bryan-TheBS-Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: dd and xfs, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: dd and xfs, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |