| To: | XFS Mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available? |
| From: | Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:16:59 -0600 |
| In-reply-to: | <3BF14697.F90270CD@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | XFS Mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111131556430.1160-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BF14697.F90270CD@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.23i |
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:13:11AM -0700, D. Stimits wrote: > FYI, I've managed to get just over 30 MB/sec sustained (read; write > isn't too far off; both XFS and ext2 do well with average size files) on > a good 10K rpm U160 scsi drive (64 bit 66 MHz bus) if conditions are > right...no raid at all. With 5 drives on RAID 0 and your hardware specs, > can't imagine not getting far better than you get now. It sure sounds > like something is wrong. Why? IIRC, RAID0 is just concatenated disks. You're not going to get a speed boost out of it. Not until RAID1 (mirrored) will you start seeing a speed boost. -- Nate Straz nstraz@xxxxxxx sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com/ Linux Test Project http://ltp.sf.net/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?, Seth Mos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | More info on tuning..., Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?, D. Stimits |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?, Simon Matter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |