xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS, Linux, and Solaris. -- Dual GPL/Commercial Licensing

To: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS, Linux, and Solaris. -- Dual GPL/Commercial Licensing
From: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 16:23:57 -0500
Cc: "Jesse W. Asher" <jasher1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: SmithConcepts/AbsoluteValueSystems
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011107140934.0323c578@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BEA81FA.4020401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BEAE784.87ADBA1D@xxxxxxxx> <1005253982.2955.30.camel@scare>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Russell Cattelan wrote:
> It might be interesting to note many small companies previously
> generously developing GPL'ed products by burning all the VC money they
> could find are either no longer around or quickly moving to a license
> model that will allow them SELL a product.

With GPL, the days of getting rich off of selling massively reproduced
software is over.  You have to find another model to make money in
combination with the software.  In any case, don't expect to get too
rich from it -- unless you really have some innovative ideas and/or
concepts.

Which is what scares the dickens out of the most profitable of software
organizations making, what I would term, "commodity" software.

-- TheBS

-- 
Bryan "TheBS" Smith    mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx   chat:thebs413
Engineer  AbsoluteValue Systems, Inc.  http://www.linux-wlan.org
President     SmithConcepts, Inc.   http://www.SmithConcepts.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
"The [US] Constitution guarantees you Free, not Fair.  'Fair' is
a socialist concept." -- Shawn McMahon


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>