|To:||Sean Elble <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: XFS+Tux = patch trouble|
|From:||Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||07 Nov 2001 10:30:02 -0600|
|Cc:||Tux mailing list <tux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|References:||<Pine.LNX.4.33.0111061027590.4999-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <02bb01c16720$7fd7d470$0a00a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BE8A074.8494050A@xxxxxxx> <03bd01c16739$2318cff0$0a00a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
Hi Sean - I guess I wasn't quite clear. That 48k refers only to code changes in the core linux kernel, and does NOT include fs/pagebuf, fs/xfs, or fs/xfs_support. -Eric On Tue, 2001-11-06 at 21:05, Sean Elble wrote: > Whoa . . . I didn't realize that the patch was only 48k. But does that > include all the XFS "dependences", like the Page Buffer code, etc.? I would > imagine that it does, but just checking . . . -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|