| To: | mdew <rpbrown@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS Limitations rather? |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:30:32 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1005171696.369.7.camel@mdew>; from rpbrown@xxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 11:21:36AM +1300 |
| References: | <1005171696.369.7.camel@mdew> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.16i |
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 11:21:36AM +1300, mdew wrote: > I was looking at this page... > > http://www.suse.de/~aj/linux_lfs.html > > and notice that XFS indicates theres a 2T limitation under Linux, yet > every other FS (ext2/resierfs/jfs) dont seem to have this limitation, > why doesnt this "2T limitation" affect other file systems? The other file systems have the same limitation. The linux block device layer doesn't support devices > 2TB at the moment. This includes LVM and MD block devices. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs and nfs, Robert Sander |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Interesting XFS Behavior, Jeff Breitner |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS Limitations rather?, mdew |
| Next by Thread: | xfs_growfs -m, ASANO Masahiro |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |