xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: WANTED: most stable 2.4 kernel ver. plus XFS patches for SMP machine

To: "Linux XFS Mailing List" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: WANTED: most stable 2.4 kernel ver. plus XFS patches for SMP machines
From: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 09:11:18 +0100
Cc: "Martin Apel" <apel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SGI.4.40.0111070827330.288111-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 07 Nov 2001 08:31:35 +0100, Martin Apel wrote:

[...]
>We are currently running a 2.4.12 kernel on a SMP machine serving 270 G
>from a hardware RAID 5 system via NFS and Samba. I used a standard kernel

This is roughly the same size we will be serving. We also use a hardware RAID. 
We will mainly serve for Windows boxen, i.e. using Samba, but there is also a 
minor need for NFS service.

>and then applied the following patches:
>  linux-2.4.12-xfs-2001-10-11.patch.bz2
>  LVM 1.0.1-rc4

Just for my education: Why is it that you use LVM? To be able to grow the 
filesystem while it's online? Please reply off-list if you feel this is off-
topic here.

>If you are planning to serve NFS you should also apply one patch which
>is part of 2.4.13. I can send it to you if you want to.

Interesting question: Then why aren't you using 2.4.13? :-)

Thanks so far for your advice.


-- 
Verkaufe Original-BMW-Raeder:                    L I N U X       .~.
http://adsl-bergs.rz.rwth-aachen.de/~rabe       The  Choice      /V\
                                                 of a  GNU      /( )\
                                                Generation      ^^-^^



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>