| To: | mingo@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS+Tux = patch trouble |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 06 Nov 2001 18:43:41 +1100 |
| Cc: | Tux mailing list <tux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Tue, 06 Nov 2001 09:20:08 BST." <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111060916320.2931-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001 09:20:08 +0100 (CET), Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: >it would be nice if SGI folks pushed harder for XFS's integration into the >mainstream kernel. We have been trying hard since at least 2.4.5. I split the big XFS patch into digestible chunks, separating the core XFS code from the add on stuff like kdb, lvm, dmapi, quota. We have been sending mail to Linus about the core XFS patches since June 5, 2001. Response - total silence. Not even "I don't like it", we get no response at all. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS+Tux = patch trouble, Ingo Molnar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS+Tux = patch trouble, Ingo Molnar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS+Tux = patch trouble, Ingo Molnar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS+Tux = patch trouble, Ingo Molnar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |