| To: | Seung-young Oh <so1713@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers, |
| From: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 04 Nov 2001 09:37:48 +0100 |
| Cc: | Linux-XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3BE47C42.9040406@xxxxxxxxx> <3BE47D86.8090309@xxxxxxxxxx> <3BE47EDA.6000301@xxxxxxxxxx> <3BE48410.6000207@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010913 |
Hi. Considering the latest SGI RH-Beta kernels are just those kernels I'd say it's a fair bet. Also, please look at the mailing list archives at http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs before posting something similar to list please. This subject has been discussed previously. http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-129.html, which the RedHat-XFS test versions are based on. But I was talking about newer 2.4.9;http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-142.html It's all in the details. You are right of course and I appologize. I shouldn't answer emails at 00:30 (or whatever it was) on a sunday morning. // Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers,, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers,, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers,, Martin K. Petersen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers,, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |