| To: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers, |
| From: | Seung-young Oh <so1713@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 04 Nov 2001 08:56:00 +0900 |
| Cc: | Linux-XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3BE47C42.9040406@xxxxxxxxx> <3BE47D86.8090309@xxxxxxxxxx> <3BE47EDA.6000301@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011013 |
Stefan Smietanowski wrote: Stefan Smietanowski wrote:Hi. Considering the latest SGI RH-Beta kernels are just those kernels I'd say it's a fair bet. Also, please look at the mailing list archives at http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs before posting something similar to list please. This subject has been discussed previously. // StefanHmm, replying to myself. No no, I AM sane. I think. Anyway, did the last mail go away as a text mail or a HTML mail? if(html) be(very_sorry);I just noticed my mozilla changed the mail to a different font all of a sudden and it seems to be a html mail although I didn't get the HTML mail editor.Hmm.. Sorry, I take that back, I might be insane after all. // StefanPS. Great job with XFS. I ran it for a long while at my last job (on linux of course), in several testing and production machines. Not a glitch. :) I think you're talking about; http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-129.html, which the RedHat-XFS test versions are based on. But I was talking about newer 2.4.9; http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-142.html -- ICQ#: 103231199 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers,, Stefan Smietanowski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers,, Martin K. Petersen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers,, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers,, Martin K. Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |