xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: More testing RPMs

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: More testing RPMs
From: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 20:56:29 -0500
In-reply-to: <1004564262.2022.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from sandeen@xxxxxxx on Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:37:42PM -0600
References: <1004564262.2022.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:37:42PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Ok gang, this time you get "PR4"

I just started fooling around with PR4 (previously running the available
2.4.3 XFS-patched kernel) on my RH 7.2 boxes.  It seems to be working
just fine on my Athlon (PR4-athlon installed), but it's having nothing
but problems on my Pentium 150 box...

The main issues that I've found are completely not XFS related, so they may
just be 2.4.9 issues:
        1) The box requires a "mem=64M" parameter appended to the kernel
        parameter line (there's a memory hole at 15-16M, so the 64M can't be
        detected...)  No matter what the lilo.conf file says, 2.4.9PR4 will
        only see 16M RAM.

        2) nfsd won't start up, saying "rpc.nfsd: nfssvc: Address already in
        use".

For the time being, I've reverted to the 2.4.3 kernel which works fine.  Has
anyone else run into these problems?

I'm going to be switching to a new Pentium set of hardware in the near
future, which should fix that 16M problem (the current box is a Compaq w/ no
BIOS available at bootup.  The "system configuration" disks don't give an
option for the memory hole...)  However, I'm not sure what to make of the nfs
problem.  (BTW: nfs serving on the 2.4.9PR4 athlon kernel is working fine.)

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Feel free to contact me (flames about my english and the useless of this
 driver will be redirected to /dev/null, oh no, it's full...).
 (Michael Beck, describing the PC-speaker sound device)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>