| To: | Theo Van Dinter <felicity@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LVM in v1.0.2 bugged? |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:14:16 +0100 |
| Cc: | Linux XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20011129085452.B19316@kluge.net>; from felicity@kluge.net on Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:54:52AM -0500 |
| References: | <20011129085452.B19316@kluge.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.16i |
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:54:52AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > As a user of LVM on other platforms, I was thinking of setting it up on my > server when I get around to converting it to XFS in the future (right now > only my home machines are XFS. :() > > So I started playing with it yesterday evening. I set aside a 3GB partition, > changed the partition type, did a pvcreate/vgcreate, no problems. However, > when I tried to do a "lvcreate -L 1G vg", I got a segfault repeatedly for any > size value I specified. > > Has anyone else had this type of problem? Your lvm user space tools probably do not match your kernel LVM. LVM user and kernel land are unfortunately in a far more intimate symbiosis than is good for them. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LVM in v1.0.2 bugged?, Theo Van Dinter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LVM in v1.0.2 bugged?, Theo Van Dinter |
| Previous by Thread: | LVM in v1.0.2 bugged?, Theo Van Dinter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LVM in v1.0.2 bugged?, Theo Van Dinter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |