| To: | Khyron <khyron@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Correct compiler for XFS? |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:50:42 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.BSF.4.33.0111290542470.72899-100000@four.malevolentminds.com>; from khyron@khyron.com on Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 05:46:15AM +0000 |
| References: | <Pine.BSF.4.33.0111290542470.72899-100000@four.malevolentminds.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 05:46:15AM +0000, Khyron wrote: > Alright, after reading the TAKE about reverting to kgcc and > esp. "undo, undo", I have to ask, which compiler is The last time Steve inadvertently switched kgcc back on as the default compiler, there was a flood of complaints. > recommended now? I used kgcc the last time I compiled XFS > support into a kernel, but that was way back in 2.4.5. > Will gcc-2.96-85 work? What about 2.95.3? I have been using > kgcc for all kernel compiles but I notice in 2.4.16, the > Changes and it seems they're up to 2.95.3 so... > > Please, recommendations welcome. I'm sure this is in the FAQ, and there is a big comment in the top-level Makefile about recommended compiler versions. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Correct compiler for XFS?, Khyron |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Correct compiler for XFS?, Khyron |
| Previous by Thread: | Correct compiler for XFS?, Khyron |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Correct compiler for XFS?, Khyron |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |