| To: | danlion@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS 1.0.2a and devfs... |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 27 Nov 2001 14:07:06 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5362759.1006891211953.JavaMail.imail@frente.excite.com> |
| References: | <5362759.1006891211953.JavaMail.imail@frente.excite.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
No particular reason, except that devfs is really not related to xfs, and it was sucking up mailing list bandwidth on linux-xfs when people had problems with it. :) -Eric On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 14:00, danlion@ex cite.com wrote: > Hi! > > I noticed that the XFS Release 1.0.2 installer for Red Hat 7.2 does not > utilize devfs. Is there any reason why devfs is no longer being used? > > Thanks! -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | XFS 1.0.2a and devfs..., danlion |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - avoid umount oops due to double vn_remove, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS 1.0.2a and devfs..., danlion |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - avoid umount oops due to double vn_remove, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |