Eric Sandeen schrieb:
>
> Well, I just noticed that "rpm -qp --requires" on the -12 series XFS
> RPMs gave different dependencies than the "stock" Red Hat RPMs did. But
> hey, if it works for you... perhaps there's no problem after all. I
> don't have a 7.1 system handy to check it on.
There is nothing wrong, stock RedHat has the same deps.
This is stock RedHat Kernel:
[root@install i686]# rpm -qp --requires kernel-2.4.9-12.i686.rpm
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
fileutils
modutils >= 2.4.6
initscripts >= 5.83
mkinitrd >= 3.2.2
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
And here the XFS enabled:
[root@install i686]# uname -a
Linux install.cad.sba 2.4.9-12SGI_XFS_1.0.2 #1 Thu Nov 15 15:32:24 CST
2001 i686 unknown
[root@install i686]# rpm -q --requires kernel
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
fileutils
modutils >= 2.4.6
initscripts >= 5.83
mkinitrd >= 3.2.2
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
So, nothing to worry.
-Simon
>
> -Eric
>
> On Mon, 2001-11-19 at 11:00, Simon Matter wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I'm confused now. I have updated to 2.4.9-12SGI_XFS_1.0.2 today and
> > I didn't have any problem. My machine had all updates from RedHat
> > installed before I did the kernel upgrade. Everything should be fine,
> > or?
> --
> Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
> sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc.
--
Simon Matter Tel: +41 61 695 57 35
Fr.Sauter AG / CIT Fax: +41 61 695 53 30
Im Surinam 55
CH-4016 Basel [mailto:simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
|