| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: performance degraded 2.4.8 -> 2.4.9? |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:59:01 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1005752233.25611.2.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>; from lord@sgi.com on Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 09:37:12AM -0600 |
| References: | <3BF1A6F2.273B49C4@fnal.gov> <1005696924.21227.4.camel@UberGeek> <3BF27ACB.B744479A@fnal.gov> <1005752233.25611.2.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.16i |
> Its a myth! We do not have changes all over the kernel, and we > definitely do not have any changes in the block layer. The last Hmm, last time I checked you had some support for delayed buffers there... Not that I think that particular it is very intrusive, but I had some problems with it in the past porting it to a custom kernel. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: performance degraded 2.4.8 -> 2.4.9?, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: performance degraded 2.4.8 -> 2.4.9?, Dan Yocum |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: performance degraded 2.4.8 -> 2.4.9?, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: performance degraded 2.4.8 -> 2.4.9?, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |