I don't know if you can, but I'd suggest using either 2.4.14 or 2.4.15
when it's ready since the loopback bug will be fixed in that version.
On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 17:04, Dan Yocum wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What happened between 2.4.8 and 2.4.9 that the disk I/O performance
> would
> *dramatically* drop? With 2.4.8 I'm getting ~34MB/s writes and ~160MB/s
> reads. As of 2.4.9 this has dropped to ~10MB/s writes and 80-100MB/s
> reads. That's pretty bad. The problem was not fixed with 2.4.10 and is
> still the same as of 2.4.13pre6 - I haven't checked the latest in a
> couple
> weeks, maybe it's better?
>
> I've decided to drop back to 2.4.5 since 2.4.8 was regularly crashing
> the
> machines, the "kernel: __alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed." errors
> seem to have gone away, and the performance is right up there.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Dan
>
> --
> Dan Yocum
> Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Fermilab 630.840.6509
> yocum@xxxxxxxx, http://www.sdss.org
> SDSS. Mapping the Universe.
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|