xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?

To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 13 Nov 2001 09:24:38 -0600
Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, XFS Mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111131617410.1290-100000@mustard.heime.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111131617410.1290-100000@mustard.heime.net>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 09:19, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> > Reading in Linux does readahead - but I do not think it asks for more
> > than 32 pages at once. We are using mostly the generic linux code paths
> > for read unless you use O_DIRECT.
> 
> ok...
> I currently use the Tux web server, and cannot change the way it reads.
> Can I rather patch the kernel source to allow for 64-page readahead?
> That'll be 256kB chunks, something the SCSI devices will appreciate a lot,
> and thus making me a happy man :-)

Actually if you are using md then it will report its max readahead
during startup, it appears to use different numbers:

md0: max total readahead window set to 496k
md0: 2 data-disks, max readahead per data-disk: 248k

Take a look at your syslog output.

Steve

> 
> --
> Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCA
> 
> Computers are like air conditioners.
> They stop working when you open Windows.
-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>