xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS and preemptive kernel patch

To: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS and preemptive kernel patch
From: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 09:11:24 +0600
Cc: Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0111100952020.14588-100000@gusi.leathercollection.ph>; from jijo@leathercollection.ph on Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 09:54:04AM +0800
References: <20011109151218.A5600@bee.lk> <Pine.LNX.4.40.0111100952020.14588-100000@gusi.leathercollection.ph>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 09:54:04AM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2001 at 15:12, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
>
> > Is anybody using XFS with preemptive kernel patch?  Since I don't have
> > any "non-production" machines to do a test, any feedback would be very
> > useful.
> 
> So yes, it's great. But only if you'll be using the machine's console. For
> most other server functions the overall kernel throughput will suffer a
> bit and really won't be worth it.

How about using preemptive patch on a firewall, running tranparent proxy
(squid/iptables) and also a little bit of qos/fair queuing stuff (includes XFS
on software raid 1)?

Will try it today and send some feedback.

Regards,

Anuradha

-- 

Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.13)

Jones' Second Law:
        The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone
        to blame it on.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>