Eric,
Thanks for the clarification . . . makes a bit of a difference, don't you
think? :-) Either way, it's 48k well worth sticking into the Linus kernel .
. .hope he gets around to it soon. Thanks again, and have a good one!
-----------------------------------------------
Sean P. Elble
Editor, Writer, Co-Webmaster
ReactiveLinux.com (Formerly MaximumLinux.org)
http://www.reactivelinux.com/
elbles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
To: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Tux mailing list" <tux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; "XFS Mailing list"
<linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: XFS+Tux = patch trouble
> Hi Sean - I guess I wasn't quite clear. That 48k refers only to code
> changes in the core linux kernel, and does NOT include fs/pagebuf,
> fs/xfs, or fs/xfs_support.
>
> -Eric
>
> On Tue, 2001-11-06 at 21:05, Sean Elble wrote:
> > Whoa . . . I didn't realize that the patch was only 48k. But does that
> > include all the XFS "dependences", like the Page Buffer code, etc.? I
would
> > imagine that it does, but just checking . . .
>
> --
> Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
> sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc.
|