xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS use in production environment

To: Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS use in production environment
From: Derek Richardson <derek.richardson@xxxxxxx>
Date: 05 Nov 2001 09:36:42 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200111031140.MAA07221@foehn.quickstep.oche.de>
References: <200111031140.MAA07221@foehn.quickstep.oche.de>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Martin,
Thanks for the info, I appreciate it.  I wasn't really all that worried
about using XFS, I've done a bit of stability testing myself, proved
fine.  But we're going to stick w/ one of the RedHat distro kernels,
patched for XFS (probably 2.4.9 at this point), because I want to stick
away from the new VM (I agree that it's probably an improvement, but
I've had 2.4.9 and 2.4.12 kernels blow up on me - locked the box
completely - and I'm not willing to bet my job on it) and because this
more or less keeps w/ the standard around here.  Thanks for the
testimonial and advice!
Regards,
Derek R.

On Sat, 2001-11-03 at 05:40, Martin Spott wrote:
> Derek Richardson <derek.richardson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hello, I'm a new subscribee, was wondering if anyone knows of any
> > statistics regarding XFS filesystem use in a serious production
> > environment, or has personal experience (I take it there's quite a bit
> > here...).
> 
> Sorry, I don't know of any statistics. But I might approve that i'm running
> 2.4.4-XFS on a customers 'PPS' ("Production Planning System", as we call it
> in Germany). This means the customer _really_ depends on a working machine,
> otherwise they would be in " real trouble' (TM) after short time.
> 
> The machine is running since July with only one reboot (to switch power
> supplies), havingpretty used > 40 GByte filesystems on external FibreChannel
> array. They're running a OO database in filesystem, so you can imagine that
> it's I/O dependent.
> 
> I believe you don't want to use such an old kernel. You'd better want to try
> a recent one (2.4.13) because of all the fixes that went in. I'm pretty
> happy with 2.4.13-XFS on the fileserver at work. The only reason I didn't
> upgrade the kernel on our customer's machine is not to touch the uptime  ;-)
> 
> Martin.
> -- 
>  Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
-- 
Junior Linux Geek
713-817-1197 (cell)
713-781-4000 x2267 (office)
"Linux users, fanatical.  No way...
HEY! Get that MCSE up on the altar,
Tux must be appeased!"


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>