xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers,

To: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Dear RedHat-XFS developers,
From: Seung-young Oh <so1713@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2001 08:56:00 +0900
Cc: Linux-XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3BE47C42.9040406@orgio.net> <3BE47D86.8090309@stesmi.com> <3BE47EDA.6000301@stesmi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011013
Stefan Smietanowski wrote:

Stefan Smietanowski wrote:

Hi.


Considering the latest SGI RH-Beta kernels are just those kernels I'd say it's a fair bet. Also, please look at the mailing list archives at http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs before posting something similar to list please. This subject has been discussed previously.

// Stefan




Hmm, replying to myself. No no, I AM sane. I think.

Anyway, did the last mail go away as a text mail or a HTML mail?

if(html)
  be(very_sorry);

I just noticed my mozilla changed the mail to a different font all of a sudden and it seems to be a html mail although I didn't get the HTML mail editor.

Hmm..

Sorry, I take that back, I might be insane after all.

// Stefan

PS. Great job with XFS. I ran it for a long while at my last job (on linux of course), in several testing and production machines. Not a glitch. :)




I think you're talking about;

http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-129.html

, which the RedHat-XFS test versions are based on. But I was talking about newer 2.4.9;

http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-142.html

--
ICQ#: 103231199


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>