xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: More testing RPMs

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: More testing RPMs
From: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:15:19 -0500 (EST)
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1004564262.2022.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Question.

I'm currently running the 2.4.9-7 on my RH7.1 machine.

Is there really that much of a difference, or am I ok in continuing that 
trend.

I ask as I haven't had any problems, yet, with 2.4.9-7PR3...I don't mind 
continuing to test these out, but I feel I should go the correct path.

On 31 Oct 2001, Eric Sandeen wrote:

> Ok gang, this time you get "PR4"
> 
> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/testing/RH2.4.9-6 (for RH7.1)
> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/testing/RH2.4.9-7 (for RH7.2)
> 
> Changes in PR4:
> 
> * Disabled (broken) xfs support in intermezzo
> 
> * Merged in a few recent xfs fixes
> 
> Have fun,
> 
> -Eric
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>