| To: | Mark Pruett <mpruett@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux XFS on Alpha's |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:57:35 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <002601c1618f$41338e80$6501a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from mpruett@xxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 02:07:19PM -0800 |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20011029193944.036e1710@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <002601c1618f$41338e80$6501a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
hi, On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 02:07:19PM -0800, Mark Pruett wrote: > Is anyone here using XFS on Linux on the Alpha platform? > We've been testing both XFS and Reiserfs, and we always > get problems requiring xfs_repair during power-off tests (where > we intentionally kill power during disk writes.) We invariably > lose the directory to which the files were written, and end up > with a huge number of files in lost+found. Are you running xfs_repair before log recovery (ie. mount)? If so, that's bad - you need to mount first so that the journal can be replayed before you run xfs_repair. Try also a current (xfsprogs-1.3.12+) version of xfs_repair - this will warn you if the log is dirty when you try to run xfs_repair, and will not allow it. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - put LGPL on dmapi-relevant headers, Dean Roehrich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Who / What's using Linux XFS?, Matthew Geier |
| Previous by Thread: | Linux XFS on Alpha's, Mark Pruett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Who / What's using Linux XFS?, Robert Sander |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |