xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FAQ update

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FAQ update
From: mdew <rpbrown@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 29 Oct 2001 15:29:51 +1300
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20011028155036.038993e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011028155036.038993e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2001-10-29 at 03:51, Seth Mos wrote:
> Included explanation for redhat installer disks releases.
> 
> In short: Be patient while SGI and some others are working on this.
> 
> Cheers
> ps. I could have seen this coming before going on vacation.
> --
> Seth
> Every program has two purposes one for which
> it was written and another for which it wasn't
> I use the last kind.
> 

just a small question regarding XFS and daily rpm updates..is it
_really_ needed?

it would be easier to say maintain rpms for major releases i.e major
kernel releases or major XFS changes, rather manage an entire daily rpm
tree aswell... ? 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>