xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: gcc 2.91.66, 2.95.3, 2.95.4, growfs

To: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gcc 2.91.66, 2.95.3, 2.95.4, growfs
From: kris buggenhout <kris.buggenhout@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 23:26:46 +0200
References: <200110262003.KAA01554@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sidik Isani wrote:

> Hello -
>
>   I'd like to upgrade to the proper kernel compiler, but things are
>   still confusing.  About 10 days ago . . .
>
>   Believe me, I want to use the "right" version, but it is not easy!
>

I find this really strange ... I have been using gcc3.1 for a few months now
and I havent had the slightest problem in compiling kernels or whatsoever...
My system runs a 2.4.13 kernel for days on end ... xfs and all ... have no
trouble

not in compiling ( unless U call some warnings about depreciated use of
initing var's compile problems)
not in running  (system is up for days on a row, ftp serving, connected to the
internet doing e-mail relays etc... not a dormant system...)
not in anything else but smooth runnin.

doing 3D renderings in the background ... cpu is 1000% of the time 70-99% busy
runnin apps, writin and readin


I know that for support and debug reasons , one recommends to use egcs, or one
of the approved kernel compilers. but its not a mandatory thing ...
If ya just plan on running and help test the code base...
expect to get it to compile on any compiler ... as U cannot be shure of the
installed compiler in this chaotic user base, linux is ...


kind regards,

Kris Buggenhout

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kris
Buggenhout
Project engineer Proffesional Services

SUN Microsystems Belgium
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>