[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected.

To: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected.
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:05:13 -0500
Cc: Utz Lehmann <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Schmitt <schmitt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, florin@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxx> of "25 Oct 2001 10:55:09 EDT." <yq14ronpy5u.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> writes:
> Steve> Ah ha, now thats a good idea - of course I still think its the
> Steve> md code, but at least we have a chance of catching it now.
> I took a look at MD last night and didn't see anything obvious
> sticking out.
> Will do a second pass in a bit...
> -- 
> Martin K. Petersen      Cereal Bowl Engineer, Linuxcare, Inc.
> http://mkp.net/         SGI XFS, Linux/PA-RISC, GNOME

Martin, forget md, you can make this happen without it, looks like we 
introduced a sign bug ourselves somewhere.... I just toasted the loop
based filesystem in about 10 seconds. Hopefully with a case this 
simple to reproduce it should not take long now.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>