| To: | "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected. |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:05:13 -0500 |
| Cc: | Utz Lehmann <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Schmitt <schmitt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, florin@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxx> of "25 Oct 2001 10:55:09 EDT." <yq14ronpy5u.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> writes: > > Steve> Ah ha, now thats a good idea - of course I still think its the > Steve> md code, but at least we have a chance of catching it now. > > I took a look at MD last night and didn't see anything obvious > sticking out. > > Will do a second pass in a bit... > > -- > Martin K. Petersen Cereal Bowl Engineer, Linuxcare, Inc. > http://mkp.net/ SGI XFS, Linux/PA-RISC, GNOME Martin, forget md, you can make this happen without it, looks like we introduced a sign bug ourselves somewhere.... I just toasted the loop based filesystem in about 10 seconds. Hopefully with a case this simple to reproduce it should not take long now. Steve |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Martin K. Petersen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Martin K. Petersen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Martin K. Petersen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Martin K. Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |