On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 04:18:52PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> You might take a look at the recent kernels in the testing/ dir, if you
> extract the patches from the SRPMS it might not be a bad place to start,
> both of these are based on -ac kernels.
Hm, we've been looking around, but we don't know which exact dir/kernel
you're refering too. No kernels looked like they were -ac kernels.
> (note that the lvm code in the 2.4.9 kernel is broken, if that matters
> to you).
No plans to use LVM atm.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:28:12PM +0200, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
> And, as previously mentioned, check the Mandrake cooker kernels.
Hm. We're poor Debian people. I think "cooker" is what "sid" or
"unstable" is in our distribution, but browsing the web I only found RPM
mirrors, not SRPM's, and then, I see "kernel" and "kernel-linus"
packages. The latter I guess it's pristine Linus tree, and the first one
must be Mandrake's custom kernel, which I have no clue if it's based on
-ac or not.
I guess the "one -ac patch every two weeks" wasn't so good? Is it a big
pain for you?
Jordi
(speaking for a bunch of rpm-iliterates :)
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || jordi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx || Rediscovering Freedom,
aka Oskuro in || jordi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx || Using Debian GNU/Linux
Reinos de Leyenda || jordi@xxxxxxxxxx || http://debian.org
http://sindominio.net GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/917A225E
telnet pusa.uv.es 23 73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC 2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E
pgpPcBazizEwm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|