xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS

from [utz lehmann] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS
From: utz lehmann <xfs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 14:07:27 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3BD24607.2BFAB6E@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200110192316.XAA00329@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BD0BD18.2272B325@xxxxxxxxxx> <3BD1FDB1.4ED31DF5@xxxxxxxxxx> <200110202220.AAA02493@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BD24607.2BFAB6E@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i 
Hi

D. Stimits [stimits@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> I don't know if the NVidia stuff is merely binary-only, and follows DRM
> specs, or if it is both binary-only AND uses its own DRM infrastructure.

Its (mostly) binary only and has its own kernelinterface (/dev/nvidia*).

> >From what has been said, it *appears* that a kernel configured for 4.1.x
> DRM will not work with NVidia...I don't know, this is part of the
> confusion. 

That is not true. You _dont_ need DRM support at all for the nvidia driver.


utz
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS, D. Stimits
Next by Date:  Request for XFS kernel rpms for the newly released RedHat 7.1 Linux kernel update, Tomas Ericsson
Previous by Thread:  Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS, D. Stimits
Next by Thread:  Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS, D. Stimits
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]