xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS

To: stimits@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS
From: Nick (Gunnar) Bluth <bluth@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 01:44:07 +0200
In-reply-to: <3BD1FDB1.4ED31DF5@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200110192316.XAA00329@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BD0BD18.2272B325@xxxxxxxxxx> <3BD1FDB1.4ED31DF5@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2001 00:41 schrieb D. Stimits:

> > That sucks, I don't want to lose DRM if I multiboot between kernels that
> > have 4.1.x and 4.0.x. Somehow I doubt running both versions is easy or
> > reasonable. I wonder if NVidia has its DRM out yet for 4.1.x (I guess
> > SGI is a big participant in DRM area).
>
> I should rephrase things. I'm am so dependent on OpenGL that without it,
> I would have to abandon all future software that breaks it. If this
> means XFS, or Redhat, or 2.4.x kernels over a certain release, then that
> is the way it goes. Hardware OpenGL is not an option, it is a
> requirement.

Don't see your problem... NVidia doesn't use DRM at all, they use their own 
kernel driver (which I compiled yesterday for 2.4.12-ac3)...

Nick

-- 
Nick (Gunnar) Bluth   Muenster/Germany   bluth@xxxxxxxxxxx RHCE/RHCX
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
In 1984 mainstream users were choosing VMS over UNIX.  Ten years later
they are choosing Windows over UNIX.  What part of that message aren't you
getting? - Tom Payne


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>