xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS

from [Steve Lord] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 15:23:21 -0500
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Andy Kwong <iserlohn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx> of "Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:22:09 EDT." <3BD08B71.BBDC6271@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Hi Bryan -
> > What's "the 'beta' tree?"
> 
> According to Russel Ingram in the Linux+XFS HOWTO (dated
> 2001-10-18):
> 
> "two distinct trees are available: 
>    o  linux-2.4-xfs: fast moving development tree
>    o  linux-2.4-xfs-beta: stable bug fix only tree"

I think the beta tree is really stable - it never moves!

Steve
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS, Bryan-TheBS-Smith
Next by Date:  xfs with 2.4.10 anb kernprof, Andrew Theurer
Previous by Thread:  Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS, Bryan-TheBS-Smith
Next by Thread:  Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]