| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: backport to 2.2 |
| From: | Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:52:49 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization: | Epigenomics AG |
| References: | <news2mail-slrn9slfkb.id3.gurubert-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20011015134816.A20094@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Robert Sander <gurubert-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | slrn/0.9.7.2 (Linux) |
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:50:44 +0000 (UTC), Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote: > It would be very hard, nearly like a new port of XFS. XFS and its pagebuf > layer is heavily tied to the 2.4+ VM system and uses infrastructure that > wasn't > there in 2.2. I see. And as the VM is causing most of the trouble in 2.4, how stable would you rate XFS? Tonight I will try the Mandrake 2.4.8 kernel (which already has the needed aacraid patch included), but when that one also fails, we have to revert to 2.2.19 and ext2. Greetings -- Robert Sander Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG Bioinformatics R&D www.epigenomics.com Kastanienallee 24 +493024345330 10435 Berlin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: backport to 2.2, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | A question about upgrading, s-luppescu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: backport to 2.2, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: backport to 2.2, Bryan-TheBS-Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |