| To: | Robert Sander <gurubert-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: backport to 2.2 |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:48:16 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <news2mail-slrn9slfkb.id3.gurubert-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 10:46:35AM +0000 |
| References: | <news2mail-slrn9slfkb.id3.gurubert-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 10:46:35AM +0000, Robert Sander wrote: > Hi! > > Are there any thoughts about backporting XFS to the Linux kernel 2.2.19? > > The current non-stability of the 2.4 series makes it nearly impossible > to run that great filesystem on production machines. > > Would it be very hard to do? Else we would have to switch back to ext2 > losing the journaling option. It would be very hard, nearly like a new port of XFS. XFS and its pagebuf layer is heavily tied to the 2.4+ VM system and uses infrastructure that wasn't there in 2.2. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: backport to 2.2, Seth Mos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: backport to 2.2, Robert Sander |
| Previous by Thread: | backport to 2.2, Robert Sander |
| Next by Thread: | Re: backport to 2.2, Robert Sander |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |