"Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > which would the developers choose as being the most stable kernel
> > version to use on a production server? let me try that and see if
> > i have the same problem and work from there.
>
> I've several systems running well with 2.4.10-xfs. .11 and .12 didn't
> last long enough, so stay away. 2.4.7-xfs was ok as I remember. I'm just
> testing with 2.4.13-pre2-xfs.
I've been testing with 2.4.13-pre1-xfs (with the addition of the final
partition patch off of the Linux Kernel list) and just now (since early
morning) vanilla 2.4.13-pre2-xfs (that already has the final patch).
My tests are simple, on my SMP box, do my normal work, but have a kernel
build (" make clean; make -j 3 bzImage ") going 24/7 for some time.
So far, everything is stable except for a possible very slow memory
leak... (not sure about it, I'll report more later when I have some
better numbers).
--
Erich Stefan Boleyn <erich@xxxxxxxx> http://www.uruk.org/
"Reality is truly stranger than fiction; Probably why fiction is so popular"
|