| To: | Nigel Kukard <nkukard@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: total/partial fs corruption |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Oct 2001 22:37:02 +1000 |
| Cc: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Sun, 14 Oct 2001 14:23:43 +0200." <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110141422150.1797-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001 14:23:43 +0200 (SAST), Nigel Kukard <nkukard@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >i have a really stupid question, could sumone plz send me a diff to 13pre2 >that i must apply for this testing? i don't want to download the entire >cvs (not that i'm 100% sure how)... hehehe. :) On its way. There was a patch reject on one driver due to RCS id differences, just delete the first two lines of the offending driver. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: total/partial fs corruption, Nigel Kukard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.5 or 2.6 rephrased, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: total/partial fs corruption, Nigel Kukard |
| Next by Thread: | Re: total/partial fs corruption, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |