xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

2.5 or 2.6 rephrased

To: SGI XFS Dev List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 2.5 or 2.6 rephrased
From: Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 08:20:51 -0400
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Steve, lemme try again.

For production (business/academic/???) users, people for whom a change in
filesystem is a flag day that costs $$, a choice to switch to a kernel that
is only provided by SGI is a tough one. I don't know how I'd justify such a
thing. The old question of support/maintainance/longevity is a real tough
one to wave away in that case.

What would you say to such a user in making the case to use an XFS kernel,
when technical arguments alone won't do?

-- 
Alan Eldridge
from std_disclaimer import *


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>