| To: | Hristo Grigorov <Hristo.Grigorov@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patching CVS tree |
| From: | Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Oct 2001 04:14:26 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <20011014080343.SMFB18920.fep01-app.kolumbus.fi@there>; from Hristo.Grigorov@xxxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 11:03:53AM +0300 |
| References: | <20011014080343.SMFB18920.fep01-app.kolumbus.fi@there> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 11:03:53AM +0300, Hristo Grigorov wrote: >I want to patch the xfs CVS tree with the kernel preemptive patch. >But, what happens on the next cvs update? Does it remove it automatically ? Umm, what happens is that you confuse the crap out of CVS. It would be an ill-advised thing to do. >And, is it in general recommended to do that or I have to clone the CVS tree >every time and do my "nasty" expreriments there ? What's your opinion on >that ? Apply your patches each time to a separate build copy. You don't want to build out of the CVS tree, anyway. Keep it untouched so you can do 'cvs update' to just pick up the deltas. -- Alan Eldridge from std_disclaimer import * |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux 2.5 or now 2.6 targeted, Alan Eldridge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Total/Partial corruption, Nigel Kukard |
| Previous by Thread: | patching CVS tree, Hristo Grigorov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patching CVS tree, jacob berkman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |