Re: Patch for 2.4.12 borked?

[Walt H <waltabbyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes. Except I was patching using the xfs-cvs patch to allow future 
updating from CVS. That must be the difference. Not sure why, as I 
assume that the standard xfs patches include the stuff in cmd/ as well? 
Anyway, thanks for checking and sorry for the wild goose chase. I did 
get it patched just fine from the parent dir with -p0. Thanks again for 
the great FS.
-Walt


Eric Sandeen wrote:

> Actually, it seems to work fine for me.  Strange that it works for you
> on some files, and not on others...?
>
> You did something like this?
>
> cd /path/to/top/of/linux-2.4.12
> bzcat /path/to/2.4.12-xfs-patch.bz2 | patch -p1
>
> -Eric
>
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> > It could be "borked" - I didn't test it, it's generated with an
> > automatic script.  Let me try to re-gen it...
> >
> > -Eric