| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Patch for 2.4.12 borked? |
| From: | Walt H <waltabbyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Oct 2001 19:57:53 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <3BC7A0C0.9020307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BC7A256.7A23440C@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010914 |
Ooops...Upon further review, after viewing the patch and re-applying a couple different times, I found that by applying the patch from the parent directory with -p0 fixed it. It all applies cleanly. Not too borked I guess :) -Walt Eric Sandeen wrote: It could be "borked" - I didn't test it, it's generated with an automatic script. Let me try to re-gen it... -Eric Walt H wrote:Hello, I downloaded the cvs patch for 2.4.12 and attempted to apply it. It mostly went without a hitch, however, every now and again it would stop and not be able to find the file to patch. I used patch -p1 from within the root of where I unpacked 2.4.12 into. Is there something different I should've done? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Patch for 2.4.12 borked?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Patch for 2.4.12 borked?, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Patch for 2.4.12 borked?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Patch for 2.4.12 borked?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |