| To: | Jim Crilly <noth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Oops on recovery with Linux-2.4.11-xfs on SPARC |
| From: | Anders Hammarquist <iko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:13:34 +0200 |
| Cc: | Sean Neakums <sneakums@xxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Jim Crilly <noth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> of "12 Oct 2001 02:45:45 EDT." <1002869146.796.3.camel@warblade> |
| References: | <6ulmii5wxp.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200110111930.VAA25865@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1002869146.796.3.camel@warblade> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> Also on sparc64 the kernel is 64-bit but the userspace is only 32-bit, > so there's a conversion for anything passed from userspace to kernel via > ioctls. Actually, these days there is a 64-bit libc, so you can compile 64-bit userland stuff (not that there are many 64-bit binaries around). However, compiling them for 64-bit mode made no difference for xfs_repair, it still died of SIGBUS in approximately the same place. I haven't looked at any of the other userspace utilites yet (apart from mkfs). /Anders -- -- Of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong. Anders Hammarquist | iko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Physics student, Chalmers University of Technology, | Hem: +46 31 88 48 50 G|teborg, Sweden. RADIO: SM6XMM and N2JGL | Mob: +46 707 27 86 87 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.11 and large files, Robert Sander |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Oops on recovery with Linux-2.4.11-xfs on SPARC, Anders Hammarquist |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Oops on recovery with Linux-2.4.11-xfs on SPARC, Jim Crilly |
| Next by Thread: | inheriting group ID working?, David Orman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |