xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - work around gcc bug during xfs_growfs

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Peter Wächtler <pwaechtler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - work around gcc bug during xfs_growfs
From: Hristo Grigorov <Hristo.Grigorov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 20:19:01 +0300
Cc: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3BC5C255.D11E41E5@xxxxxxx>
References: <200110102047.f9AKlqE00907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BC5C1A4.7FFB877E@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BC5C255.D11E41E5@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thursday 11 October 2001 19:01, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Hi Peter -
>
> Peter Wdchtler wrote:
> > Would you please provide code snippets or give a hint which portion in
> > xfs_growfs triggers this compiler bug?
>
> You can see the diff at
>
> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/linux-2.4-xfs/linux/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.
>c.diff?r1=1.69&r2=1.70
>
> > Not that I don't believe you ;) It gives me really headaches..
> >
> > Did you report this to the gcc maintainers?
>
> I probably won't report it to the gcc folks, since their latest compiler
> (3.0.1) does not exhibit this bug any longer.   (Or maybe that's just
> lucky... perhaps I should report it anyway).

gcc version 3.0.2 20010905 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 3.0.1-3)

That's the latest one.

>
> When RH7.2 comes out (soon?) I'll check their compiler and report it to
> them if it's still there.  It exists in the stock Mandrake 8.1 compiler,
> and I have notified them.
>
> -Eric

-- 
Regards, Hristo.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>