| To: | Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.11 and large files |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:54:23 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20011010164752.A30951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200110101439.f9AEdP407977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-slrn9s8feg.ti2.gurubert-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200110101439.f9AEdP407977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 16:47 10-10-2001 +0200, Robert Sander wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 09:39:25AM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > If you are using a non-xfs filesystem for I/O then unless your application > opens the file without O_LARGEFILE it will get bounced out of the kernel > this way when it attempts to cross the 2G boundary. This code is not > in the xfs I/O path right now. I see, but this must be new, because dd works on 2.4.5 and not on 2.4.11, hm. Why do these changes occur in a "stable" kernel. Because it is actually the start of the 2.5 series perhaps, and linus forgot to tell us :-) Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.11 and large files, Robert Sander |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.11 and large files, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.11 and large files, Robert Sander |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.11 and large files, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |