| To: | nic@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:29:44 -0500 |
| Cc: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20011010132408.02d1f3f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E15rI4P-0000RJ-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E15rIfX-0000JG-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Compilers are still a touchy subject... we just found one compiler bug last week w/ the RH 7.1 version of GCC, which caused filesystem corruption if you use xfs_growfs. gcc 3.0.1 from Mandrake did not exibit this problem... In short, "kgcc" is still the only compiler that we have a lot of confidence in - others may work most of the time, but I still don't have a "warm fuzzy" about any of them. -Eric nic wrote: > However there is an inconsistency between the Makefile and the FAQ: the > Makefile implies that the ordinary RH compiler works since 7.1. -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE - Remove generated scsi files, Keith Owens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.11 and large files, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet., nic |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.), nic |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |