xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CXFS [was: XFS (v.1.0.1 for RedHat 7.1) and XFS (Irix 6.5.13m) diffe

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: CXFS [was: XFS (v.1.0.1 for RedHat 7.1) and XFS (Irix 6.5.13m) differ?]
From: Rob Latham <rlatham@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 08:23:22 -0400
In-reply-to: <Pine.SGI.4.10.10110091646150.288437-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from shyberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 05:05:35PM -0400
References: <200109271535.f8RFZf908442@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SGI.4.10.10110091646150.288437-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 05:05:35PM -0400, Sven G Hyberts wrote:

>       I made a couple of attempts to get GFS on a Linux machine.  It
> turned out to quite hard - and once I got it through the compiler, I get
> the notice that several functions are not defined.  Maybe I give it
> another attempt - yet after realizing that it is a non-journaling file
> system format, the lure isn't as "shiny" any more...

GFS is indeed a journaling file system.

==rob

-- 
[ Rob Latham <rlatham@xxxxxxxxxx>         Developer, Admin, Alchemist ]
[ Paralogic Inc. - www.plogic.com                                     ]
[                                                                     ]
[ EAE8 DE90 85BB 526F 3181                   1FCF 51C4 B6CB 08CC 0897 ]


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>