| To: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet. |
| From: | nic <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:02:41 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4.3.2.7.2.20011010132408.02d1f3f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Quixotic Hackers |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20011010132408.02d1f3f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | nic@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wednesday 10 October 2001 12:24, Seth Mos wrote: > > >Software info: > >Machine is RedHat 7.1 + glibc (and other bits) from 7.1.94 > >gcc-2.96-85 > > Can you compile with compat-egcs and try again? > Sometimes weird things happen with xfs and 2.96-?? I've seen this said before (most often by your good self :-) but I've always built my 2.4.x-xfs kernels with it... including the one I'm running now. Will try and let you know, nic |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet., Seth Mos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CXFS [was: XFS (v.1.0.1 for RedHat 7.1) and XFS (Irix 6.5.13m) differ?], Rob Latham |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet., Seth Mos |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet., nic |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |